首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost Analysis and Comparison of HVAC, LFAC and HVDC for Offshore Wind Power Connection
【2h】

Cost Analysis and Comparison of HVAC, LFAC and HVDC for Offshore Wind Power Connection

机译:海上风电连接的HVaC,LFaC和HVDC成本分析与比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Low frequency AC (LFAC) has been proposed as a means to avoid some of the large converter station costs of high voltage DC (HVDC) while delivering some of the benefits in terms of better line or cable utilization and its technical feasibility has been established. It is said to offer a lower costs than HVDC or conventional high voltage AC (HVAC) for a range of intermediate distances, with HVDC becoming cheaper over long distances. However, the basis for identifying the distance range and extent of cost saving has not been established. Here, cost estimate methodologies are extended for LFAC. A difficulty is the absence of commercial schemes that can provide practical examples of costs. In this paper, costs are broken down into constituent terms and estimates are made from the most similar equipment from other schemes. The capacity limits and power losses associated with subsea cables are analyzed for low frequency cases. For a given power transfer and for each distance, a choice of operating voltage, cable size and number of parallel circuits is made in order to find the lowest route cost. This yields cost as a function of distance that is a non-linear and discontinuous function. The cost curves for LFAC are compared with HVDC and HVAC options. The results for current cost estimates show that LFAC has a range of route length over which it is the lowest cost option and but this range narrows and eventually ceases to exist for higher power transfer ratings.
机译:已经提出了低频AC(LFAC)作为避免高压DC(HVDC)的一些大型换流站成本的方法,同时提供了更好的线路或电缆利用率方面的一些好处,并且已经确定了其技术可行性。据说在中等距离范围内,其成本比HVDC或常规高压AC(HVAC)低,而HVDC在长距离上变得更便宜。但是,尚未确定识别距离范围和节省成本的基础。在此,针对LFAC扩展了成本估算方法。困难在于缺乏可以提供实际成本实例的商业计划。在本文中,成本分为组成部分,并使用其他方案中最相似的设备进行估算。对于低频情况,分析了与海底电缆相关的容量极限和功率损耗。对于给定的功率传输和每个距离,要选择工作电压,电缆尺寸和并联电路数,以便找到最低的布线成本。这产生作为距离的函数的成本,该成本是非线性且不连续的函数。将LFAC的成本曲线与HVDC和HVAC选项进行比较。当前成本估算的结果表明,LFAC具有一定的路由长度范围,在该范围内它是成本最低的选项,但是此范围变窄,最终对于更高的功率传输额定值不再存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号